Frank Shorter won the 1972 Olympic marathon in Munich and
finished second in the 1976 Games in Montreal. He helped pull
America into a running boom in the 1970s and helped Boulder
become the running mecca that it is today.
So, what's Boulder's most famous runner up to these days? Local
trail runners know you can often find him lounging on his deck,
watching runners travel around the trail in his backyard. But
Frank Shorter is far from bored, dividing time between family,
public appearances, a new book project and his fight against
performance-enhancing drugs.
On Training
Currently, Shorter is working on writing a 160-page training
book for introductory-level runners. He admits it's becoming
difficult to find that much to write about. "I can truly reduce
my training theory to one typed page," Shorter says and adds
that he'll be adding a lot of photographs to the book!
His basic training philosophy is simple. To become a better
runner, combine a lot of aerobic training at a conversational
pace with one long run a week to build endurance and at least
one interval workout to develop leg speed and turnover.
Shorter says he has never had a coach, except during college,
and he developed his own workouts for his Olympic marathon
victory. Now he hopes his book will help other runners develop
their own running plan since most can't afford a running coach.
Getting motivated to run in Colorado is easy. When Shorter moved
to Boulder in 1975, he fell in love with the weather. "So much
sunshine makes training easier, especially interval training."
He also picked Boulder to take advantage of the training
benefits from living at a high elevation. "It was the only city
above 5,000 feet with an indoor track."
Catching Cheaters
Now that Shorter's elite days are done, he still likes to stay
connected in running circles so he can continue the battle
against performance-enhancing drugs. After serving a three-year
term, he recently resigned as chairman of the U.S. Anti-Doping
Agency. Now that he's not affiliated with the USADA, Shorter
feels he can be more outspoken and opinionated. "I've gone back
to being a loose cannon," he says.
Shorter believes there needs to be out-of-competition drug
testing for athletes from underdeveloped nations to help level
the playing field for the athletes living in countries that
require regular testing. To help the push for regular drug
testing, Shorter is working with major marathons in cities like
Chicago, New York and London. "They are willing, I think, to
come up with their own system that says if you want to run in
our race, show you have been tested for these drugs within this
time frame or you don't get to run for the money." Shorter won't
name the names of specific elite runners he believes are using
performance enhancing drugs, but says it's obvious to him,
especially in some of the current women's events.
American distance runners have had trouble matching the marathon
times that Shorter and many others were able to achieve in the
1970's. He feels that American runners are making a comeback now
that illegal doping is becoming much more difficult for foreign
athletes to use. "EPO is a two percent advantage. Who truly
believes they can make up two percent? That's four minutes in a
marathon." He says when you know your competitors have that much
of an advantage, it's difficult to be motivated to train.
The Olympics
Shorter's passion for fighting performance-enhancing drugs stems
from his defeat at the 1976 Olympic Games in Montreal when East
German marathoner Waldemar Cierpinski won by just 50 seconds.
It's a moment he'll never forget. "I was in Montreal and ran the
Olympic marathon course earlier this summer and I came upon the
exact spot where he pulled away from me."
A few years ago, Shorter received previously classified
documents, detailing Germany's sports drug program from the
1970's. In one letter, athletes who were involved with the drug
program were listed. Cierpinski was number 62.
Now, Shorter is still chasing cheaters. He has the influence to
change national and international policies and he feels the need
to use that power. Although it won't help him overcome the
disappointment from 1976, it could help future American runners.
He feels that if everyone is routinely tested, it will be a
strong deterrent and many athletes will no longer take the risk.